PLEASE NOTE: All bidding for the auction currently underway
at our new website at
Auction End Date
9/14/2010 1:50:30 PM (mm/dd/yyyy)
R. Abraham Elijah b. David Zevi Feingold
Moses Schneidmesser & Nehemia Hirschenhern
This listing is an independent item not part of any collection
96 pp. octavo 186:125 mm., usual light age staining. A very good copy bound in contemporary boards, rubbed.
Detailed monograph explaining the halakhot on what to do in cities and villages that do not have an erev. The permissible manner in which to draw water from wells and rivers; also to understand the words of the rabbis, authors of the Shulhan Arukh whose words are pure, deep, and desirable. All of this is done in a concise manner, the laws of what is permissible and what is prohibited, and pilpulei from the Talmud. There are two introductions and then the text in a single column in rabbinic letters. Eruv (pl. Eruvin) refers to various symbolical acts which facilitate the accomplishment of otherwise forbidden acts on the Sabbath and festivals. The literal meaning of eruv is "mixing" and it probably connotes the insertion of the forbidden into the sphere of the permissible (cf. Maim., Yad, Eruvin, 1:6). Thus, though it is forbidden (biblically, according to some authorities, rabbinically, according to others) to walk further than 2,000 cubits from one's town on the Sabbath or festivals, one may "mix" the forbidden and permitted areas by establishing an eruv teḥumim (boundary eruv). This is accomplished by placing sufficient food for two meals (also called eruv teḥumim) less than 2,000 cubits from the town, thus establishing another "residence" from which one can again walk the permissible distance in any direction. This ordinance is evidently ancient since its existence is assumed in tannaitic sources (cf. Er. 3–5; Tosef. Er. 3–7; et al). It is discussed extensively in the Talmud (cf. Er. 26b–61b; TJ, Er. 3–5) and by later authorities (e.g., Tur, Sh. Ar., OḤ 408–16). A similarly old statute (attributed to Solomon in Er. 21b) is that of eruv ḥaẓerot (domain eruv). While carrying between private and public domains is forbidden on the Sabbath, the rabbis also forbade carrying between two private domains. For example, if several houses opened onto one courtyard, an object could not be removed from one house to another, nor from a house to the courtyard (the latter is considered private property, owned by all the residents, if it is surrounded by a wall at least ten handbreadths high). To facilitate such carrying, a loaf of bread (called eruv ḥaẓerot) owned by all the residents is placed in one of the houses, thereby symbolically creating mutual ownership of all the dwellings. The houses and courtyard are thereby "mixed" together into one private domain. The sources indicate that eruv ḥaẓerot was already practiced in the time of the Second Temple; the details are elaborated in rabbinic literature from tannaitic times (Er. 1:10; 2:6, et al.; see also Er. 17b; 61b–82a, et al.) down to the later codes (cf. Tur, Sh. Ar., OḤ 366–95). To "mix" private and public domains in order that an individual may carry from one to the other or within the latter, an eruv is erected around a given settled district. According to most early authorities, this eruv consists of a minimum of four poles at least ten handbreadths high, connected by other poles from top to top, forming the shape of a gate. The accepted practice among Jewish communities for generations has been to erect such an eruv by connecting poles (of the required height) with iron wires. A minority opinion among the authorities, based on a disagreement of interpretation of a talmudic section (Er. 11a–b; cf. Tur, Sh. Ar., OḤ 362), holds that the poles must also be no more than ten cubits apart. No eruv, however, can permit carrying within what rabbinic law considers as falling under the biblical definition of public domain (cf. Shab. 6b; Er. 6). According to most authorities, such a domain is defined as an area crossed by at least 600,000 people (the number of Jews who fled Egypt) every day, and this definition is accepted in law. Since such public domains exist only in the largest cities, an eruv is effective in most areas. Some consider the minority opinion, which finds a biblically defined public domain in most settlements. While individuals refrain from carrying in such areas, the authorities admit that this practice is not required of everyone by law (cf. Shab. 6b; Tos. to Shab., S.V. Kan; Tur, Sh. Ar., OḤ 303, 345).]
ד"ס בהשמטת "פרפרת נאה" וההסכמות.
EJ; CD-EPI 0157635
(Click thumbnail to view full size image)
Kind of Judaica